A statutory demand has arrived. A debtor has stopped paying. A company cannot meet its obligations and its directors are starting to worry about their own position. We act for creditors pursuing recovery and for debtors and directors facing personal exposure.
Personal and corporate insolvency in Singapore is governed by the Insolvency, Restructuring and
Dissolution Act 2018. Individuals face bankruptcy or the Debt Repayment Scheme; companies face winding up, judicial management or a scheme of arrangement. Jerrie Tan LLC acts on both sides of that line, and on the director liability questions that follow.
Insolvency is usually the second act. It arrives after a commercial dispute has been won and cannot be enforced, or sometimes, after a shareholder fallout.
Issuing statutory demands for creditors, and setting them aside where the debt is disputed on substantial grounds.
Creditor applications against individuals, and defending debtors against them.
Creditors’ winding up applications, opposing them, and advising on the consequences for the company and its officers.
Applications for judicial management where a company is viable but needs protection and time to restructure.
Compromise arrangements with creditors.
Personal exposure arising on insolvency, including wrongful and fraudulent trading and breach of directors’ duties.
Clawback of undervalue transactions and unfair preferences made in the run-up to insolvency.
Where a dismissal, an investigation and a police or
Commercial Affairs Department interest run on
the same facts.
The right route depends on who the debtor is, how much is owed, and whether the underlying business or income is viable.
| ROUTE | W H O I T A P P L I E S T O | K E Y T H R E S H O L D | W H A T I T D O E S |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Repayment Scheme | Individuals in bankruptcy proceedings | Debts not exceeding $150,000 | The High Court may refer the debtor to the Official Assignee for a repayment plan of up to five years instead of bankruptcy. Completing the plan releases the debts admitted under the scheme. |
| Bankruptcy | Individuals | Creditor must be owed at least $15,000 | A creditor may apply where the debtor owes at least $15,000, cannot repay, and has a sufficient connection to Singapore — domicile, property here, residence or business here within the past year. |
| Judicial management | Companies that are viable | (a) The company is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts; and (b) a reasonable probability of rehabilitation, or of the interests of creditors being better served than on a winding up |
Places the company under an independent judicial manager with a moratorium on proceedings, buying time to rehabilitate the business rather than break it up. |
| Scheme of arrangement | Companies and their creditors | A majority in number representing 75% in value of creditors present, followed by Court sanction | A binding compromise between the company and its creditors, allowing a restructuring to proceed without liquidation. |
| Winding up | Companies | Court application or voluntary, depending on the basis for the winding up | Ends the company's life: a liquidator realises the assets and distributes them, and the conduct of the directors comes under review. |
Creditors lose money by waiting. Directors create personal liability by trading wrongfully or fraudulently. Debtors give away options by dealing with assets in the months before a formal process begins, often without realising those transactions can be unwound.
Cash flow and balance sheet, not the version in the board pack. Everything that follows depends on an accurate answer to this question.
Where a company may be heading towards insolvency, the directors' duties shift and their personal exposure grows. Contemporaneous records of the decisions taken, and why, are the defence.
For creditors, what mode of enforcement to apply is a commercial decision about what will actually produce money.
Transactions at an undervalue and unfair preferences in the run-up to insolvency can be reversed. That works for creditors and against directors who did not take advice.
Jerrie Tan is the Founding Director of Jerrie Tan LLC, a Singapore disputes practice acting where commercial risk, regulatory scrutiny and personal liability intersect. She has been in practice since 2013 and spent almost a decade at an international law firm working alongside leading Senior Counsel, developing a commercial disputes and corporate investigations practice with a particular focus on Mandarin-speaking and China-based clients.
She has more than 40 reported judgments and has appeared across the State Courts, the Supreme Court and the Singapore International Commercial Court. She teaches Advocacy to law graduates preparing for call to the Singapore Bar and serves as an Adjunct Fellow at the NUS Centre for Pro Bono and Clinical Legal
Education.
In a time when disputes lawyers become more and more specialised, not just in areas of practice but right down to specific roles and tasks, Jerrie’s exposure and width of practice makes her a ‘complete’ lawyer, who understands the full legal and commercial concerns of clients, and provides clients with holistic and well considered advice.
NARAYANAN SREENIVASAN S . C . · MANAGING DIRECTOR , SREENIVASAN CHAMBERS LLC
A creditor may file a bankruptcy application against an individual who owes at least $15,000 and is unable to repay it. The Singapore Courts set out that threshold, together with the requirement that the debtor has a sufficient connection to Singapore — they are domiciled here, have property here, or have been ordinarily resident or carried on business here within the past year. Inability to pay is usually demonstrated by serving a statutory demand and letting it go unanswered.
A scheme of arrangement is a court-sanctioned compromise between a company and its creditors, binding the dissenting minority once the required majority has approved it. Under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 the threshold is a majority in number representing 75% in value of the creditors present and voting, followed by sanction from the Court. It is worth pursuing where the business itself still works and the problem is the debt structure rather than the trading — a scheme lets the company restructure without a liquidator taking control. The work sits in the preparation: the classes of creditors, the disclosure to them, and the evidence that the scheme leaves them better off than a winding up would.
Yes, in defined circumstances — insolvency is where directors’ conduct is examined most closely. The Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 provides for liability where a company’s business has been carried on fraudulently, and for wrongful trading where debts are incurred without reasonable prospect of the company meeting them; separately, directors’ duties under company law continue to apply.
Judicial management is designed to save a company; winding up ends it. In judicial management an independent judicial manager takes control and a moratorium holds creditors off, giving a viable business room to restructure — it is used where there is something worth preserving. The winding up of the proven insolvent appoints a liquidator to realise the assets, distribute them in the statutory order and dissolve the company, with the directors’ conduct reviewed along the way. Choosing between them is a commercial judgment about whether the underlying business can still generate value.
Consultations are by appointment and treated in confidence. Whether you are the employer or the employee, the first week is where most of the damage is done.
This page is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create a solicitor–client relationship. Outcomes depend on the specific facts of each matter. Case references are described only as far as they appear in publicly reported judgments. Please seek advice on your own circumstances.
168 Robinson Road,
Capital Tower #20-01,
Singapore 068912
jerrie@jerrietanllc.com
Whatsapp Us
(by appointment only)
Copyright © 2026 Jerrie Tan LLC. All Rights Reserved.
